Greg Rolen | Prop 14 Impact Part 1

Prop. 14 Allows All of Sacramento to Act Like Democrats

By Greg Rolen

Shared by Greg Rolen

Thank you for stopping by Greg Rolen insight blog. Also, review Greg Rolen videos, news, pictures, Facebook, LinkedIn, biography, Facts, Wiki and more pages to know more about Greg Rolen, Gregory J Rolen.

For those that prefer a ONE PARTY SYSTEM, Prop. 14 gives them what they want.  GOP registration has tanked, Democrats have a supermajority in the legislature, all statewide offices are held by Democrats, 24 legislative seats in 2016 were contested in the November elections by Democrats—no Republicans allowed.  This is nirvana for the unions, the Soros special interests.

Still, the one-Party advocates claim this one sided approach to government is actually “bi-partisan”.  They have a point.  The 12 cent a gallon gas tax increase in April passed due to a GOP State Senator, Cannella.  The 63 cent gas tax increase passed because the so-called GOP leader, Chad Mayes, lead six other Republican lemmings over the cliff to the Democrat position—big government, higher taxes and impoverishing the middle class.

“In California, elected officials face off in fairly drawn districts and compete in public, not partisan, primaries. They go to Sacramento after running campaigns that appeal to diverse constituencies, not just party activists.

Governor Jerry Brown deserves credit for taking advantage of this new system to extend cap and trade. And Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger deserves credit for building the innovative left/right coalition in the 2000’s that helped enact nonpartisan redistricting and create a public open primary. Californians today are reaping the benefits.

In Sacramento, Democratic and Republican legislators can now be seen in public together. They can co-author legislation. In some districts, Republican state senators and Democratic Assembly members have actually campaigned together. There is even a bipartisan Karaoke night for all state legislators!

It is true a wealthy Republican sponsored the legislation to have a “citizens” redistricting commission.  But, in practice the commission was run by the Sanders wing of the Democrat Party—and the results can be seen in the Democrat super majority in Sacramento.  To them bi partisanship is one sided politics—Mensheviks vs. the Bolsheviks—the Sanders vs. Clinton folks.Pro

By John Opdycke and Steve Westly, The Hill,  09/18/17

Last month, the California legislature did something unheard of — by Washington, D.C., standards. They came together across party lines to amend and extend sweeping cap and trade emissions legislation. Business, agriculture, labor and environmentalists all had a seat at the table.

By 2030, California’s population is expected to grow by five million people, yet our greenhouse gas emissions will shrink to 40 percent below 1990 levels. In this era of cynicism and gridlock, how is this possible?

The answer may surprise you. It’s not because California is a “blue” state. If that were the reason, New York would be leading the country in legislative innovation, not state house scandals and indictments. Seven years ago, Californians overhauled the political system so that voters have more choices and politicians are incentivized to cooperate and innovate, not grandstand and polemicize.

To get different results, you have to change the structure. California now has a political system that allows the state to address 21st century challenges instead of wallow in 20th century partisanship.

Since Watergate, there has been a great debate about how to fix our broken political system. Most people asked “How do we get the money out of politics?” Californians asked “How do we get the politics out of politics?” Their answer was to enact, via ballot referendum, public open primaries and a public redistricting commission. The political parties still recruit candidates, raise money, and advocate for policy, but they no longer control drawing districts or the primary ballot. The combined results of these reforms has been nothing short of miraculous — for the voters, and for elected officials.